ArticleDigital health
The quality and reliability of short videos about migraine on Chinese social Media platforms (BiliBili and TikTok): A cross-sectional study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The quality and reliability of short videos about cervical spondylosis on TikTok and Redbook: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Alcohol-related health information on Chinese short-video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis of Douyin and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability evaluation of Parkinson's disease-related short videos on social short video platforms: cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Migraine care in the digital era: social listening insights and neurologists' perspectives from Türkiye.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Reliable, neutral, and comprehensive, or their antithesis? A cross-sectional analysis of electroconvulsive therapy-related video quality across TikTok, BiliBili, and YouTube.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Content Quality, Reliability, and Factors Associated With Likes of Venous Thromboembolism-Related Short Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A Cross-Platform Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to analyze the content and quality of migraine-related videos on Chinese video-sharing platforms. Background: In recent years, the escalating incidence and prevalence of migraine have imposed an increasing burden on individuals. Short-video platforms, such as TikTok and BiliBili, have demonstrated immense potential for disseminating health-related information. While a substantial number of migraine-specific videos are available on TikTok and BiliBili, their quality and reliability remain largely uncharacterized. Method: On 24 August 2025, short videos related to migraine were gathered from BiliBili and TikTok via a comprehensive Chinese language search. Following the extraction of fundamental information, each video was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS), the modified DISCERN tool (mDISCERN) score, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Furthermore, Spearman's correlation analysis was employed to investigate the relationships among video variables, GQS, DISCERN, and PEMAT scores. Results: TikTok demonstrated greater popularity than BiliBili, evidenced by higher numbers of likes, collections, comments, and shares. Overall, short videos on TikTok generally received superior scores across all evaluation metrics compared to those on BiliBili. Furthermore, it was observed that videos shared by Neurology Professionals consistently scored higher in GQS, mDISCERN, PEMAT-U, and PEMAT-A than those from other contributors. Spearman's correlation analysis indicated no significant association between video variables and GQS or mDISCERN scores. Conclusions: The quality and reliability of migraine-related videos on both BiliBili and TikTok were found to be suboptimal. Notably, videos shared by Neurology Professionals tended to exhibit superior quality and trustworthiness. Therefore, individuals should exercise caution when consuming short-form video content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.