ArticleIEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing2025
Speech Acoustic Markers Can Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease.
Article in IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Speech biomarkers have been used to assess motor dysfunction in people with Parkinson's disease (PD), but speech biomarkers for mild cognitive impairment in PD (PD-MCI) have not been well studied. Objective: To identify speech acoustic features associated with PD-MCI and evaluate the performance of a model to discriminate PD-MCI from participants with normal cognitive status (PD-NC). Methods: We analyzed speech samples from 42 participants with PD, diagnosed as either PD-MCI or PD-NC using the Movement disorders Society Task Force Tier II criteria as a gold-standard classification of MCI. A reading passage and a picture description task were analyzed for acoustic features, which were used to generate individual and then a final fused Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to discriminate PD-MCI and PD-NC participants. Results: The picture description task yielded a larger number of acoustic features that were highly associated with PD-MCI status compared to the reading task. Fusing the model outputs from the picture description task resulted in an AUC = 0.82 for discriminating PD-MCI from PD-NC participants. The acoustic features associated with PD-MCI stemmed from multiple speech subsystems. Conclusion: PD-MCI has a distinct speech acoustic signature that may be harnessed to develop better tools to detect and monitor this complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.