ReviewExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2025
Rethinking miRNAs in MSC-sEV therapeutics: implications for manufacture, mechanism of action, and development of robust potency CQAs.
Review in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From pathogenic to reparative: Context-Dependent function of extracellular vesicles in osteoarthritis.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) Therapy: Mechanisms, Clinical Efficacy, and Future Perspectives.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- EV-Encapsulated Mitochondrial miRNAs: Enhancing Cardiomyocyte Bioenergetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived small extracellular vesicles (MSC-sEVs) have emerged as a promising cell-free alternative to MSC-based therapies, offering superior safety, scalability, and stability profiles. These nanosized vesicles are now widely regarded as the principal therapeutic effectors of MSCs, capable of recapitulating many of the benefits attributed to their parental cells. However, their successful clinical translation depends on overcoming key challenges, particularly those related to product variability, viral safety, and the definition of mechanistically relevant potency-associated critical quality attributes (CQAs). This review explores the sources of MSC-sEV variability, including MSC tissue origin, manufacturing parameters, and limitations associated with primary and pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs. The use of immortalized monoclonal MSC lines is discussed as a potential solution to improve batch consistency. Regulatory frameworks such as the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guideline Q5A(R2) are also highlighted for ensuring viral safety in sEV manufacturing processes. A major focus is the critical evaluation of microRNAs (miRNAs) - long regarded as leading candidates for potency CQAs in MSC-sEV products. Despite their prevalence in the extracellular vesicle literature, mounting evidence challenges their functional relevance in therapeutic contexts. Studies consistently show that miRNAs are underrepresented in sEVs, occur at very low copy numbers, and lack essential components (e.g., Argonaute proteins) required for canonical RNA interference. Moreover, the efficiency of EV internalization and endosomal escape remains exceedingly low, rendering miRNA-based gene regulation mechanistically implausible at physiologically relevant doses. These findings call into question the widespread assumption that miRNAs are primary effectors of MSC-sEV activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.