ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2025
LGBTQ+ policies in the United States and mental health: The mediating role of sexual orientation discrimination among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth.
Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Research on the role of LGBTQ+ policies in the US has primarily examined how policies are associated with perceptions of LGBTQ+ communities, LGBTQ+ people's experiences of discrimination, or LGBTQ+ mental health. However, no research that we are aware of has examined the indirect effects of distinct LGBTQ+ policies on mental health outcomes among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth (SMWGD) through sexual orientation discrimination prospectively. Methods: We used state level data from the Movement Advancement Project in combination with baseline and follow up data from a sample of 429 SMWGD to understand associations between distinct LGBTQ+ policies, anxiety, and depression through sexual orientation discrimination. Participants were recruited online August 2020 through May 2021. Results: Only LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination policies, and no other policies, were significantly associated with sexual orientation discrimination. Participants living in states with more LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination policies experienced less sexual orientation discrimination at baseline, which in turn predicted less anxiety at follow-up (when controlling for anxiety at baseline). Additionally, living in states with better overall LGBTQ+ policies and youth policies were associated with significantly less anxiety, but not depression or sexual orientation discrimination. Conclusion: Results suggest that LGBTQ+ policies in the US have direct and indirect effects on the mental health of SMWGD. However, we must continue to monitor the role of LGBTQ+ policies on the lives of LGBTQ+ community members. Policy Implications: Policymakers should promote nondiscrimination policies and address the real-life impact of LGBTQ+ polices in the lives of their LGBTQ+ citizens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.