Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551589›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2025

LGBTQ+ policies in the United States and mental health: The mediating role of sexual orientation discrimination among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth.

Emily Herry, Christina Dyar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily HerryCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Christina DyarCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Testing a multistage model of risk factors for cannabis use utilizing a measurement burst design among sexual minority women, sexual minority gender diverse individuals, and heterosexual womenR01DA058642 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHRISTINA DYAR · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
Understanding Substance Use Risk among Sexual Minority WomenK01DA046716 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DYAR, CHRISTINA · 2019 to 2023
$843k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA046716NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA058642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research on the role of LGBTQ+ policies in the US has primarily examined how policies are associated with perceptions of LGBTQ+ communities, LGBTQ+ people's experiences of discrimination, or LGBTQ+ mental health. However, no research that we are aware of has examined the indirect effects of distinct LGBTQ+ policies on mental health outcomes among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth (SMWGD) through sexual orientation discrimination prospectively. Methods: We used state level data from the Movement Advancement Project in combination with baseline and follow up data from a sample of 429 SMWGD to understand associations between distinct LGBTQ+ policies, anxiety, and depression through sexual orientation discrimination. Participants were recruited online August 2020 through May 2021. Results: Only LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination policies, and no other policies, were significantly associated with sexual orientation discrimination. Participants living in states with more LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination policies experienced less sexual orientation discrimination at baseline, which in turn predicted less anxiety at follow-up (when controlling for anxiety at baseline). Additionally, living in states with better overall LGBTQ+ policies and youth policies were associated with significantly less anxiety, but not depression or sexual orientation discrimination. Conclusion: Results suggest that LGBTQ+ policies in the US have direct and indirect effects on the mental health of SMWGD. However, we must continue to monitor the role of LGBTQ+ policies on the lives of LGBTQ+ community members. Policy Implications: Policymakers should promote nondiscrimination policies and address the real-life impact of LGBTQ+ polices in the lives of their LGBTQ+ citizens.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionLGBTQ+ PoliciesMovement Advancement ProjectSexual Orientation DiscriminationState Policies

Identifiers

PMID41551589
PMCPMC12811020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.