Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551572›Full record

Trial reportBlood neoplasia2025

Outcomes of myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with omidubicel vs alternative donor sources.

Chenyu Lin, Smitha Sivaraman, Gautam Sajeev, Yan Song, Chunyi Xu, Chujun He, James E Signorovitch, Heayoung Shin, Xiao-Ying Tang, Mei-Jie Zhang and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chenyu LinDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Smitha SivaramanGamida Cell, Inc, Boston, MA.
Gautam SajeevAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
Yan SongAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
Chunyi XuAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
Chujun HeAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
James E SignorovitchAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
Heayoung ShinGamida Cell, Inc, Boston, MA.
Xiao-Ying TangCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Mei-Jie ZhangCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Linda J BurnsCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Ronit SimantovGamida Cell, Inc, Boston, MA.
Mitchell E HorwitzDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE AND RELATED AREAST32HL007057 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Gowthami M Arepally · 1985 to 2026
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omidubicel is a nicotinamide-expanded stem cell product derived from umbilical cord blood (UCB). In a phase 3 randomized trial for high-risk hematologic malignancies, omidubicel had faster neutrophil engraftment and fewer infectious complications than standard UCB transplantation. However, the clinical outcomes of omidubicel relative to other stem cell donor sources are yet to be determined. Clinical data for patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with omidubicel and standard UCB were taken from the phase 3 trial. The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry provided contemporaneous comparator cohorts of patients who met the trial eligibility criteria and who received allogeneic HCT from matched unrelated (MUD), mismatched unrelated (7/8 MMUD), and haploidentical donors. A total of 951 patients met the eligibility criteria, including 52 for omidubicel, 56 for standard UCB, 65 for 7/8 MMUD, 450 for MUD, and 328 for haploidentical donors. Omidubicel was associated with more rapid neutrophil engraftment than all other donor sources but slower platelet engraftment relative to other donor sources aside from UCB. There were no significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality among the donor sources. Omidubicel had a higher incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but similar rates of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD and chronic GVHD compared to the CIBMTR cohorts. These results support the role of omidubicel as a viable donor source in the current transplant landscape.

Identifiers

PMID41551572
PMCPMC12805917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.