Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551539›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

LLMs achieve adult human performance on higher-order theory of mind tasks.

Winnie Street, John Oliver Siy, Geoff Keeling, Adrien Baranes, Benjamin Barnett, Michael McKibben, Tatenda Kanyere, Alison Lentz, Blaise Agüera Y Arcas, Robin I M Dunbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Re-evaluating Theory of Mind evaluation in large language models.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Take caution in using LLMs as human surrogates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Winnie StreetGoogle, London, United Kingdom.
John Oliver SiyGoogle, London, United Kingdom.
Geoff KeelingGoogle, London, United Kingdom.
Adrien BaranesGoogle DeepMind, London, United Kingdom.
Benjamin BarnettGoogle, London, United Kingdom.
Michael McKibbenApplied Physics Lab, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Tatenda KanyereIndependent Researcher, London, United Kingdom.
Alison LentzGoogle, London, United Kingdom.
Blaise Agüera Y ArcasGoogle, London, United Kingdom.
Robin I M DunbarDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which large language models (LLMs) are able to perform tasks which require higher-order theory of mind (ToM)-the human ability to reason about multiple mental and emotional states in a recursive manner (e.g., I

Indexed as

AIlarge language modelsmentalizingsocial AIsocial cognitiontheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID41551539
PMCPMC12808479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.