ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2026
Ethical awareness and issues in gastrointestinal endoscopy practice: A survey study.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal endoscopy technology has significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy and the successful treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. However, a series of ethical issues have emerged, such as expanding treatment indications, which affect the fair distribution of medical resources. There is limited research on ethical issues in the field of digestive endoscopy.
aimTo investigate the level of ethical awareness among gastrointestinal endoscopy practitioners and analyze the ethical issues involved in gastrointestinal endoscopy technology.
methodsA questionnaire survey was performed to collect relevant data (gender, age, degree of education, professional title, personnel category, the level of understanding medical ethical principles, ethics training and its learning pathways) from gastrointestinal endoscopy practitioners at the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University and Dalian Friendship Hospital, including licensed physicians and nurses (including trainees and graduate students).
resultsThe majority of gastrointestinal endoscopy practitioners have received training on ethics, but there is still considerable room for improvement in their ethical awareness. Different learning pathways may affect the mastery of ethical principles, and understanding of ethical principles is more easily achieved through hospital ethics institutions.
conclusionTo address the ethical issues in gastrointestinal endoscopy technology, it is necessary to enhance the humanistic education of gastrointestinal endoscopy practitioners, incorporate ethical standards into the technology assessment process, and establish a patient-centered diagnostic and treatment model to improve the ethical awareness of practitioners and achieve a balance between technology and ethics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.