ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2025
X-ray reflectivity from micrometre-scaled surfaces using nanobeams.
Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "X-ray Coulomb Counting" to Understand Electrochemical Systems.Photon science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sample and diffractometer alignment for grazing-incidence X-ray measurements become ever more crucial once the beam and surface area of interest reach the nanometre scale. Here we show how a point of interest on a surface can be kept in the beam while measuring X-ray reflectivity, even if it is not in the centre of rotation, either because of systematic errors or additional unwanted angle-dependent sample movement. This can be achieved by a 1D trajectory scan varying the angle of incidence (θ), the detector angle (2θ) and the position of the sample along one axis in the scattering plane. As an example, we show the results of X-ray reflectivity measured from a 10 × 10 µm Au island using a 90 nm beam. Data analysis is presented which considers the angle-dependent X-ray beam footprint illuminating both the Au island and the surrounding support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.