ArticlePeerJ2026
Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib-based regimens in patients with HER2-positive stage III/IV breast cancer: a real-world retrospective study in China.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data from multiple clinical trials have shown that pyrotinib has demonstrated significant efficacy and acceptable tolerability in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC). However, the short time to market in China limits our comprehensive understanding of the drug's long-term efficacy and potential adverse events (AEs) from the drug. Therefore, this study analyzed the clinical efficacy and safety of pyrotinib-based regimens in a real-world database. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients with HER2-positive stage III/IV BC who were treated with pyrotinib-based regimens from October 2018 to October 2022 at the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. Tumor assessments were based on RECIST 1.1, and AEs were assessed and graded according to NCI-CTCAE 5.0. Long-term efficacy was evaluated by calculating median progression-free survival (mPFS, defined as the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or death). Results: Of the 37 included patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 62.2%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 94.6%, and the median progression-free survival length was 12.0 months (95% CI [5.8 ∼18.2] months). A subgroups comparison found that significant differences were observed in patients who had not used lapatinib ( Conclusion: Pyrotinib-based regimens have shown satisfactory clinical efficacy in HER2-positive stage III/IV BC patients, and pyrotinib is well tolerated with manageable adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.