Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551472›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Multifractal analysis of vegetation regulation on ecohydrological processes in a small watershed.

Kai Shi, Bin Hu, Qiang Xiao, Songlin Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kai ShiCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China.
Bin HuCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China.
Qiang XiaoInstitute of Ecology, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China.
Songlin TanNanchong Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Central Station of Sichuan Province, Nanchong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Runoff from small catchments facilitate water movement and a hydrologic balance across an area. In the watershed hydrological cycle, precipitation serves as the primary source of runoff, while runoff represents a delayed response to precipitation. Vegetation plays a crucial regulatory role in the relationship between precipitation and runoff through multiple ecohydrological mechanisms, including interception, infiltration regulation, and evapotranspiration. In different small watersheds, the dominant coupling mechanisms between precipitation and runoff exhibit clear temporal-scale dependence due to the variability of meteorological conditions and vegetation dynamics. Moreover, these interactions are strongly influenced by topographic features, vegetation cover, and soil composition, resulting in considerable uncertainty in the interrelationships among precipitation, runoff, and vegetation. Methods: We investigated the nonlinear relationship between precipitation and runoff at various time scales, drawing on long-term observational data (2017-2022) from the Quxi River catchment in China. We used the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis (MF-DCCA) to explore scale-dependent dynamics. The multifractal parameter was applied to reveal how water retention in the Quxi River small watershed varies across scales. To explore seasonal vegetation effects, we further conducted sliding window and Pearson correlation analyses. Results: EEMD, detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), and MF-DCCA analyses were applied to runoff, precipitation, and vegetation cover data in the Quxi River watershed, China. EEMD revealed that high-frequency modes of precipitation and runoff, with a ∼2-week cycle, explained significant data variance. DFA showed precipitation as a random process, while runoff exhibited long-term persistence. MF-DCCA confirmed multifractal characteristics in precipitation-runoff coupling, with the multifractal parameter quantifying hydrological responses. Correlation coefficients between the multifractal parameter and fractional vegetation cover (FVC) were -0.07 (spring), 0.54 (summer), 0.34 (autumn), and 0.42 (winter), indicating vegetation's moderating effect, especially in summer. Although both spring and summer have substantial precipitation exceeding 1,100 mm, the effects of vegetation dynamics on the watershed's water retention capacity differ significantly between the two seasons. This is attributed to the vegetation type characteristics of the small watershed. This novel approach, integrating remote sensing and multifractal analysis, quantified vegetation's regulation of watershed hydrology, offering a robust method to assess water retention capacity. It supports ecological restoration, forest management, and sustainable development in small watersheds, adaptable to regions with large hydraulic projects, enhancing ecosystem stability and biodiversity.

Indexed as

PlantsWater MovementsChinaEcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationForestsFractalsHydrologyRainRiversSeasonsSoilSustainable DevelopmentSoilMultifractalPrecipitationRunoffSmall watershed

Identifiers

PMID41551472
PMCPMC12805911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.