Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551440›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Prolonged growth and extended subadult development in the

Holly N Woodward, Nathan P Myhrvold, John R Horner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Holly N WoodwardDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0413-0681
Nathan P MyhrvoldIntellectual Ventures, Bellevue, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3994-5143
John R HornerSchmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1806-1656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: We present the most comprehensive histological analysis of Results: The best-supported model incorporated all visible growth marks, produced the narrowest confidence bands, and indicated lower maximum growth rates and a delayed attainment of asymptotic size (~35-40 years) compared with earlier estimates. We also find that two immature specimens within the

Indexed as

DinosaursFemurFossilsTibiaAnimalsModels, StatisticalDinosaurGrowthLife historyOsteohistologySpecies complexStatisticsTyrannosaur

Identifiers

PMID41551440
PMCPMC12811967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.