ArticleChina CDC weekly2026
Large Language Model-Based Text Recognition and Structured Data Extraction for Dietary Surveys.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional dietary surveys are time-consuming, and manual recording may lead to omissions. Improvement during data collection is essential to enhance accuracy of nutritional surveys. In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have been rapidly developed, which can provide text-processing functions and assist investigators in conducting dietary surveys. Methods: Thirty-eight participants from 15 families in the Huangpu and Jiading districts of Shanghai were selected. A standardized 24-hour dietary recall protocol was conducted using an intelligent recording pen that simultaneously captured audio data. These recordings were then transcribed into text. After preprocessing, we used GLM-4 for prompt engineering and chain-of-thought for collaborative reasoning, output structured data, and analyzed its integrity and consistency. Model performance was evaluated using precision and F1 scores. Results: The overall integrity rate of the LLM-based structured data reached 92.5%, and the overall consistency rate compared with manual recording was 86%. The LLM can accurately and completely recognize the names of ingredients and dining and production locations during the transcription. The LLM achieved 94% precision and an F1 score of 89.7% for the full dataset. Conclusion: LLM-based text recognition and structured data extraction can serve as effective auxiliary tools to improve efficiency and accuracy in traditional dietary surveys. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, more accurate and efficient auxiliary tools can be developed for more precise and efficient data collection in nutrition research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.