Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551333›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery2026

Breaking biofilm barriers in skin wounds: Membrane-Active antimicrobials in an era of resistance.

Lisa Myrseth Hemmingsen, Nataša Škalko-Basnet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa Myrseth HemmingsenDrug Transport and Delivery Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, University of Tromsø the Arctic University of Norway, Universitetsvegen 57, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Nataša Škalko-BasnetDrug Transport and Delivery Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, University of Tromsø the Arctic University of Norway, Universitetsvegen 57, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds remain a significant challenge for healthcare systems worldwide, placing a considerable burden on both patients and resources. Their management is further complicated by the persistence of biofilm-forming bacteria and an escalating problem of antimicrobial resistance, both of which restrict the effectiveness of conventional therapies. Antimicrobial compounds with a rapid onset of action and activity that is not solely dependent on bacterial metabolism represent promising alternatives for bacterial and biofilm eradication. Among these, membrane-active antimicrobials (MAAs), including antimicrobial peptides, peptidomimetics, and other membrane-disrupting compounds, constitute a particularly interesting group of agents. Recent investigations have revealed diverse mechanisms through which MAAs compromise biofilm integrity, ranging from permeabilization of bacterial membranes to interference with quorum sensing and extracellular polymeric substances. Furthermore, pharmaceutical innovations such as nanoparticle-based carriers, hydrogel matrices, and scaffold-based delivery systems have shown potential to enhance MAA stability, optimize and prolong release profiles, improve antimicrobial and anti-biofilm efficacy, increase tissue penetration, and mitigate cytotoxicity concerns. By integrating insights from microbiology, materials science, and drug development, this short review aims to outline the challenges posed by biofilms in chronic wounds, appraise the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity of MAAs, and discuss how advanced delivery strategies might expand their clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

Bacterial membraneBiofilm disruptionBiofilmsChronic woundsMembrane-active antimicrobialsPharmaceutical technology

Identifiers

PMID41551333
PMCPMC12808496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.