ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Acupuncture for ICU patients: evidence, mechanisms, and implementation challenges.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroacupuncture-inspired neuroimmune modulation in sepsis: evidence appraisal and ICU trial-design priorities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Electroacupuncture in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical applications, mechanisms of action, and methodological and implementation challenges of acupuncture in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, to provide a theoretical foundation for its standardization and evidence-based advancement. Methods: A comprehensive analysis of recent clinical studies, mechanistic investigations, and consensus guidelines regarding acupuncture use among ICU patients was conducted. The review summarizes its efficacy in analgesia and sedation, ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), delirium, and gastrointestinal dysfunction, while systematically addressing aspects of infection control, procedural standardization, and research design. Results: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews indicate that acupuncture interventions can effectively reduce reliance on analgesic and sedative medications, shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, reduce the incidence of ICU-AW and delirium, and improve gastrointestinal motility. Mechanistic studies suggest that acupuncture exerts its effects via several pathways, including activation of the vagus nerve-cholinergic anti-inflammatory reflex, modulation of central analgesic networks, restoration of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis homeostasis, and enhancement of microcirculation. However, clinical implementation remains limited by infection-control concerns, procedural heterogeneity, and the overall low quality of evidence. Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that acupuncture is generally safe and exerts multisystem regulatory effects in ICU patients, supporting its potential as a complementary therapy in critical care. Nevertheless, its role should be further validated through rigorous multicenter trials, standardized operational frameworks, and strict aseptic protocols prior to its incorporation into routine ICU practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.