Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551291›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2025

Interobserver agreement: Individual CTG features show better agreement among investigators than the overall CTG assessment in cases of meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

Linas Rovas, Meile Minkauskiene, Kristina Berskiene, Vaiva Maciulionyte, Akvile Papievyte, Ruta Petkeviciute, Augusta Petrusaite, Agne Pinauskaite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of midwifery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linas RovasKlaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Meile MinkauskieneLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Kristina BerskieneLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vaiva MaciulionyteKlaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Akvile PapievyteLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Ruta PetkeviciuteLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Augusta PetrusaiteKlaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Agne PinauskaiteLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this investigation was to evaluate the interobserver agreement between different investigators on selected cardiotocogram (CTG) parameters.

methodsMedical records were selected from birth histories of cephalic deliveries with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. A total of 84 CTGs were recorded and analyzed by six clinicians. Agreement metrics such as proportion of agreement (Pa) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and reliability indices calculated via the Fleiss kappa statistic, were employed to quantify interobserver consistency.

resultsCTG parameters baseline rate, variability, presence or absence of decelerations, and total time of decelerations demonstrated good or moderate interobserver agreement, kappa ranged 0.47-0.80, indicating fairly high consistency in estimating these parameters. The kappa coefficients for these features ranged from moderate to very good levels. The assessment of accelerations exhibited only weak to moderate concordance (kappa: 0.29-0.47). Evaluation of the deceleration type yielded the lowest agreement. The overall categorization of CTGs into categories exhibited only poor to moderate interobserver concordance (Fleiss kappa: 0.19-0.44).

conclusionsCTG parameters - baseline rate, variability, presence/absence of decelerations, and total width of decelerations in a 30-minute CTG interval - are features that can be interpreted with a high degree of objectivity and agreement with appropriate training, even without clinical experience. Since the categorization of CTGs into separate categories (normal, suspicious, and pathological) has a poor to moderate level of agreement, it indicates a need for discussion on whether it is worth continuing to rely on such CTG categorical stratification or base CTG judgements on more objective and high agreement parameters.

Indexed as

cardiotocographyfetal heart rateinterobserver agreementintrapartum fetal monitoringreliability

Identifiers

PMID41551291
PMCPMC12810198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.