ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Patellar Clunk Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Treatment.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Noise Generation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison Between Mobile-Bearing and Cruciate-Retaining Designs with Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patellar Clunk Syndrome (PCS) is a known complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prior studies have identified multiple risk factors for PCS, including male sex, patellar size, and implant design. Previous literature suggests surgical intervention as the preferred treatment for PCS. No review to date has systematically assessed risk factors and treatment outcomes of PCS. Methods: Following PRISMA protocol, 4 online databases were searched for English language studies published during or after the year 2000 that reported PCS as a primary outcome of TKA and identified (1) risk factors for developing PCS and/or (2) outcomes following treatment. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The following outcomes were collected and reported: demographic information, overall PCS complication rate, risk factors, treatment plans, and treatment outcomes. Results: The initial search yielded 699 articles. A total of 316 articles underwent full-text review; 24 articles were ultimately included and analyzed. Nineteen articles assessed risk factors, 2 assessed treatment outcomes, and 3 assessed both. Of the articles assessing risk factors, 9 (41%) reported specific implants, 3 (16%) reported mobile-bearing design, and 2 (9%) reported posterior stabilized (PS) design. Additional risk factors identified include retained patella, smaller patellar thickness, and higher postoperative knee flexion. Five articles assessed arthroscopic treatment for PCS, and all demonstrated satisfactory outcomes. Conclusions: Risk factors for developing PCS include implant design, implant type, retained patella, patellar thickness, and higher postoperative flexion. Other risk factors were not supported by multiple studies. Arthroscopic treatment has strong evidence for improving functional outcomes in patients with symptomatic PCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.