Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551269›Full record

ReviewMethodsX2026

An in depth investigation on device-to-device communication in heterogeneous networks: opportunities and challenges.

Amjad Ali, Aqsa Zehra, Muhammad Nafees, Muhammad Awais Amin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amjad AliKarachi Institute of Economic and Technology, Pakistan.
Aqsa ZehraKarachi Institute of Economic and Technology, Pakistan.
Muhammad NafeesKarachi Institute of Economic and Technology, Pakistan.
Muhammad Awais AminData Science Consultant Datamatics Technologies, Gulburg Greens, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate data from appropriate areas and in rural areas collect reliably and quickly with the help of UAVs. UAVs are used to gather any type of information either from land, sea, or air. The communication between UAV to UAV and UAV to the ground requires some linkage or a path for transmission. Device-to-device transmission is used to offload traffic in a congestion network. However, a D2D transmission is based on multiple networks. All these networks are collectively discussed in this paper included; cellular, 5G, military, ad-hoc, IoT, Social, and public safety scenarios. A variety of advantages in terms of reliability, latency, spectrum efficiency, energy efficiency, interference mitigation, high altitude, power optimization, autonomous relaying, increased throughput, high data rates, privacy, security, mode selection, FANET, MANET, VANET, coverage extension, and covert communication is given in this paper. Eventually, in this paper, we provide all the opportunities and challenges in D2D transmission over contrasting network domains.

Indexed as

5G environmentAd-hoc networksCellular networkIoT domainMilitary domainPublic safety scenariosSocial networksUAVs D2D transmission

Identifiers

PMID41551269
PMCPMC12808536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.