Article in Data science in science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Aidan NeherDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1853-7637
Apostolos StamenosDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-4181-7080
Mark FiecasDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sandra E SafoDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9593-4778
Thierry ChekouoDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3594-9182
Funding
ABCD-USA Consortium: Coordinating CenterU24DA041147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SANDRA A BROWN, TERRY L. JERNIGAN · 2015 to 2026
$54.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Data Analysis, Informatics and Resource CenterU24DA041123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ANDERS M DALE · 2015 to 2026
$51.5M
Adolescent Substance Use Initiation: Disentangling neurocognitive risks from consequences using longitudinal and genetically-informed methodsU01DA041120 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Sylia Wilson · 2015 to 2026
$34.5M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041089 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Joanna Jacobus, Susan F. Tapert · 2015 to 2026
$31.7M
Prospective Research Studies of Maturation (PRISM)- Research ProjectU01DA041134 · NIDA · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ERIN MCGLADE, PERRY FRANKLIN RENSHAW · 2015 to 2026
$29.2M
ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECTU01DA041048 · NIDA · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI Megan Marie Herting, ELIZABETH R SOWELL · 2015 to 2026
$28.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mary M Heitzeg, Chandra Sekhar Sripada · 2015 to 2026
$24.9M
FIU-ABCD: Pathways and Mechanisms to Addiction in the Latino Youth of South FloridaU01DA041156 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Raul Gonzalez, Angela R Laird · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041148 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Damien A Fair, Rebekah S Huber · 2015 to 2026
$22.3M
ABCD-USA: NYC Research ProjectU01DA041174 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Arielle Ryan Baskin-Sommers, Betty J Casey · 2015 to 2026
$19.7M
Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Prospective Research in Studies of Maturation (PRISM) ConsortiumU01DA041117 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LINDA CHANG, THOMAS M ERNST · 2015 to 2026
$19.5M
15/21 ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project Site at LIBRU01DA050989 · NIDA · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI ROBIN L AUPPERLE, MARTIN P. PAULUS · 2020 to 2026
Integrating high-dimensional, heterogeneous data from multi-site cohort studies with complex hierarchical structures poses significant variable selection and prediction challenges. We extend the Bayesian Integrative Analysis and Prediction (BIP) framework to enable simultaneous variable selection and outcome modeling in data of a multi-view nested hierarchical structure. We apply the proposed Bayesian Integrative Mixed Modeling (BIPmixed) framework to the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, leveraging multi-view data, including structural and functional MRI and early life adversity (ELA) metrics, to identify relevant variables and predict the behavioral outcome. BIPmixed incorporates 2-level nested random effects to enhance interpretability and make predictions in hierarchical data settings. Simulation studies illustrate BIPmixed's robustness in distinct random effect settings, highlighting its use for complex study designs. Our findings suggest that BIPmixed effectively integrates multi-view data while accounting for nested sampling, making it a valuable tool for analyzing large-scale studies with hierarchical data.
Indexed as
early life adversityhierarchical bayesian factor modelslatent variablesmulti-view integrationNeuroimagingpredictive modeling
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
A Bayesian Integrative Mixed Modeling Framework for Analysis of the Multi-Site Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study. · full record | OpenQuestion