ArticleTranslational animal science2026
Prioritization of SNP markers for genomic prediction in closed beef cattle populations.
Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advances in high-throughput technologies, genomic information is becoming readily available. This has led to whole genome sequences and denser single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels being generated for more individuals. However, the increase in genomic information has shown little benefit in improving the prediction accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). One method to best utilize the increased amount of SNP information is to optimize the selection of informative SNP markers. In this study, genomic prediction of growth traits in two closed beef cattle populations using various prioritization techniques was evaluated. The first population used is Line 1 Hereford. The data consisted of 1192 animals with genotypes and phenotypes. The second population is a composite breed (50% Red Angus, 25% Charolais, 25% Tarentaise) and included of 2776 genotypes and phenotypes. The SNP prioritization methods adopted in this study were based on fixation index (Fst) and GWAS based SNP marker effects. Using a subset of prioritized SNP markers increased the accuracy for all three traits for the Line 1 Hereford population. On the other hand, using a weighted
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.