Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551232›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2025

Spatial Adaptive Selection using Binary Conditional Autoregressive Model with Application to Brain-Computer Interface.

Zikai Lin, Junsouk Choi, Ruoxuan Mao, Bangyao Zhao, Jian Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Spatial Adaptive Selection using Binary Conditional Autoregressive Model with Application to Brain-Computer Interface.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zikai Lin
Junsouk Choi
Ruoxuan Mao
Bangyao Zhao
Jian Kang

Funding

Statistical ICA Methods for Analysis & Integration of Multi-dimensional Data Diversity SupplementR01MH105561 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, KANG, JIAN · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
Scalable Bayesian methods for big imaging data analysisR01DA048993 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHNSON, TIMOTHY D, KANG, JIAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
Bayesian Network Biomarker Selection in Metabolomics DataR01GM124061 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KANG, JIAN · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048993NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124061NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical imaging studies, scalar-on-image regression presents significant challenges due to limited sample sizes and the high-dimensionality of datasets. Additionally, imaging predictors often exhibit spatially heterogeneous activation patterns and complex nonlinear associations with the response variable. To address these issues, we propose a novel Bayesian scalar-on-image regression model with the Spatial Adaptive Selection using Binary Conditional Autoregressive Model (SAS-BCAR) prior. The proposed approach leverages a binary conditional autoregressive model to capture spatial dependencies among feature selection indicators, effectively identifying spatially structured sparsity patterns within image data, while addressing nonlinear relationships between image predictors and the response variable. Furthermore, our SAS-BCAR incorporates an adaptive feature selection mechanism that adjusts to varying spatial dependencies across different image regions, ensuring a more precise and robust feature selection process. Through extensive numerical simulations on benchmark computer vision datasets and analysis of electroencephalography data in brain-computer interface applications, we demonstrate that the SAS-BCAR model achieves superior predictive performance compared to state-of-the-art alternatives, particularly in scenarios with limited training data. Supplementary materials including computer code, R packages, datasets, and additional figures are available online.

Indexed as

Bayesian methodbinary conditional autoregressive modelbrain-computer interfacesscalar-on-image regression

Identifiers

PMID41551232
PMCPMC12811028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.