ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Ensemble learning for predicting microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer using pretreatment colonoscopy images and clinical data.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Assessment of the Four-Chamber View in Fetal Cardiac Ultrasound Videos.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Multi-Omics for Predicting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Resistance.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important molecular biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC), associated with favorable prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conventional MSI testing, including immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), is invasive, time-consuming, and resource-dependent, underscoring the need for non-invasive and automated alternatives. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an ensemble learning framework integrating pretreatment colonoscopy images and routine clinical data for non-invasive MSI prediction in CRC. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with pathologically confirmed CRC and IHC-determined MSI status were included. Pretreatment colonoscopy images and routine clinical variables were collected. Five deep learning architectures (ResNet-50, EfficientNet, DenseNet, VGG-16, and Vision Transformer) were trained on image data, while four machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Gradient Boosting) were trained on clinical data. The best-performing models from each modality were combined using a majority-voting ensemble. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Interpretability was evaluated using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) for image models and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for clinical models. Results: Among 1,844 patients, VGG-16 achieved the best image-based performance (AUROC = 0.896, accuracy = 0.832, recall = 0.708). Logistic Regression outperformed other clinical models (AUROC = 0.898, accuracy = 0.825, recall = 0.828). The ensemble model integrating both modalities achieved AUROC = 0.886, precision = 0.920, and recall = 0.845, outperforming single-modality approaches. Conclusion: The proposed ensemble learning framework provides a non-invasive, interpretable, and accurate method for MSI prediction, offering potential to improve preoperative precision diagnostics and clinical decision-making in colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.