Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551156›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Novel mtDNA methylation-associated prognostic signatures in colorectal cancer.

Qiang Wang, Zhongsheng Chen, Lianghe Li, Jiandong Zhang, Qing Li, Wei Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiang WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Zhongsheng ChenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Lianghe LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Jiandong ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Qing LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Wei ZhanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Given the high morbidity and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as its challenging treatment, the present study was conducted to identify reliable prognostic signatures for predicting clinical outcomes. Methods: This study identified key genes through differential expression analysis and cluster analysis on CRC transcriptomic data from public databases and mitochondrial DNA methylation-related genes (MDM-RGs) from previous literature. Cox analysis and machine learning were used to define prognostic genes and build a prognostic model, followed by the establishment of a nomogram to assess the risk score as a prognostic indicator. Furthermore, the impact of prognostic genes was explored by employing immune infiltration, antitumor immunoassay, medication sensitization assay, and prognostic gene dependency analysis. In addition, the expression of MDM-RGs in CRC was assessed by qPCR and Western blotting. Results: Consequently, this study identified three prognostic MDM-RGs (TINAG, EPHB2, and FCN3), and a risk model was constructed based on these three prognostic genes. A nomogram was created to predict CRC prognosis clinically. Significant differences in risk scores were observed across subgroups, particularly in stage and T stage groups. This study observed disparities in immune cells involving lymphocytes and memory cells, with the identification of 92 pharmaceuticals showing intergroup significant differences. Sorafenib, Salubrinal, and Roscovitine were positively correlated with the risk score, whereas WO2009093972 was negatively correlated. Additionally, this study identified several target genes such as FBXO25 with TINAG, CCDC28A with EPHB2, and SH2D6 with FCN3, with subsequent validation achieved through qPCR and western blotting. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study identifies three prognostic genes, providing new insights into CRC pathogenesis and potential therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerdrug sensitivityimmune infiltrationmitochondrial DNA methylationprognostic genes

Identifiers

PMID41551156
PMCPMC12807941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.