ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
Predicting mood swings in women of reproductive age using machine learning on metabolic, menstrual, and lifestyle indicators.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Women's Health Wearables: From Continuous Signals to Actionable Digital Phenotypes Across the Reproductive Lifespan.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mood swings in reproductive-age women arise from interacting hormonal, metabolic, and lifestyle factors, yet scalable screening tools remain limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches offer the potential to integrate diverse predictors and enable early, data-driven risk stratification. Objective: To evaluate the performance of ML algorithms in predicting mood swings among reproductive-age women using menstrual, metabolic, and lifestyle survey data and to identify the most influential predictors. Methods: The study cohort included 465 reproductive-age women, with fifteen survey-derived features categorized into metabolic (e.g., BMI, recent weight gain, polycystic ovary syndrome), menstrual (regular periods, period length), lifestyle (fast-food consumption, daily exercise), symptom burden score, and demographic (age) categories. We compared five ML models: Random Forest, SVM, Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, and CatBoost, using precision, recall, F1, accuracy, and AUCPR metrics. Feature importance was assessed with permutation feature importance (PFI) and shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: Across models, the highest values achieved were precision 0.83, recall 0.91, accuracy 0.74, and AUCPR 0.87. PFI and SHAP converged on symptom burden as the dominant predictor, with additional signal from lifestyle indicators (higher fast-food consumption, lower daily exercise) and metabolic/dermatologic markers. Menstrual regularity/length contributed minimally; age showed a modest inverse association. Conclusions: Low-cost, self-reported features can support ML prediction of mood swings in reproductive-age women with good performance. Findings motivate prospective validation, dynamic prediction with wearables, and evaluation of AI-based approaches for early detection of women's mental health concerns in community and primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.