Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551061›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Predicting mood swings in women of reproductive age using machine learning on metabolic, menstrual, and lifestyle indicators.

Rawan AlSaad, Farah El Rayess, Rajat Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rawan AlSaadWeill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Farah El RayessWomen's Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Rajat ThomasWeill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mood swings in reproductive-age women arise from interacting hormonal, metabolic, and lifestyle factors, yet scalable screening tools remain limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches offer the potential to integrate diverse predictors and enable early, data-driven risk stratification. Objective: To evaluate the performance of ML algorithms in predicting mood swings among reproductive-age women using menstrual, metabolic, and lifestyle survey data and to identify the most influential predictors. Methods: The study cohort included 465 reproductive-age women, with fifteen survey-derived features categorized into metabolic (e.g., BMI, recent weight gain, polycystic ovary syndrome), menstrual (regular periods, period length), lifestyle (fast-food consumption, daily exercise), symptom burden score, and demographic (age) categories. We compared five ML models: Random Forest, SVM, Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, and CatBoost, using precision, recall, F1, accuracy, and AUCPR metrics. Feature importance was assessed with permutation feature importance (PFI) and shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: Across models, the highest values achieved were precision 0.83, recall 0.91, accuracy 0.74, and AUCPR 0.87. PFI and SHAP converged on symptom burden as the dominant predictor, with additional signal from lifestyle indicators (higher fast-food consumption, lower daily exercise) and metabolic/dermatologic markers. Menstrual regularity/length contributed minimally; age showed a modest inverse association. Conclusions: Low-cost, self-reported features can support ML prediction of mood swings in reproductive-age women with good performance. Findings motivate prospective validation, dynamic prediction with wearables, and evaluation of AI-based approaches for early detection of women's mental health concerns in community and primary care settings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencelifestylemachine learningmental healthmetabolicwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID41551061
PMCPMC12808425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.