ArticleCommunications physics2025
Neural heterogeneity enables adaptive encoding of time sequences.
Article in Communications physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timing mechanisms in biological systems operate across a vast range of scales, from microsecond precision for sound localization to annual cycles. A key open question concerns the mechanisms for encoding intermediate time intervals-hundreds of milliseconds to minutes-that are essential for navigation, communication, memory, and prediction. Here we present a theoretical framework that explains how neurons can represent such intervals using a common biophysical property: neural fatigue, where activity diminishes during sustained stimulation. Our Bayesian framework combines parametrically heterogeneous stochastic dynamical modeling with interval priors to predict available timing information independent of the actual decoding mechanism. We find that a trade-off emerges between accurately representing the most recent interval and retaining information about previous ones. We show that cellular diversity is not just tolerated but required to encode sequences of time intervals. Our work highlights the computational role of biological heterogeneity in shaping memory for time, with implications for understanding temporal processing in neural circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.