ArticleJAR life2026
Identification of intrinsic capacity impairment: diagnostic performance of integrated care for older people (ICOPE) screening tools in Zimbabwe.
Article in JAR life, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework proposes screening (Step-1) and subsequent in-depth assessment (Step-2) to inform personalised interventions to promote intrinsic capacity (IC) in older adults. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of screening approaches against in-depth assessments in Zimbabwe. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited older adults age ≥65 years in urban Zimbabwe. For both Steps 1 and 2, IC was assessed using WHO ICOPE-proposed and/or alternative assessments for seven domains: cognition, locomotion, vitality, vision, hearing, psychological, and urinary continence. Diagnostic performance of screening approaches was assessed using metrics, including sensitivity and specificity categorised as good (≥0.80), fair (≥0.50-0.79), poor (<0.50). Results: The 763 adults were mean (standard deviation) age 74.5(7.2) years: 62.9 % female. Frequencies of IC impairments ranged from 18.1 % for hearing to 92.0 % for vision based on screening, and 13.4 % for urinary incontinence to 62.9 % for vision based on in-depth assessments. Performance of 37 different screening approaches and in-depth assessment comparisons were tested. Of the eight screening approaches with the best performance, sensitivity ranged from good ( Conclusion: Each domain had a screening approach with good or fair sensitivity and mostly fair specificity, supporting use in ICOPE implementation in Zimbabwe, which is urgently needed given the high prevalence of IC impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.