ArticleJAR life2026
A predictive model for cognitive decline using social determinants of health.
Article in JAR life, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) is critical but often constrained by limited access to fluid and imaging biomarkers, particularly in low-resource settings. Objective: To develop and evaluate a predictive model for cognitive decline using survey-based data, with attention to model interpretability and fairness. Methods: Using data from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), a nationally representative longitudinal survey of adults aged 50 and older ( Results: The model achieved a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 39.25 (95 % CI: 38.12-40.52), representing 10.2 % of the cognitive score range, on a 20 % held-out test set. Features influencing predictions, included education level, age, reading behavior, floor material, mother's education level, social activity frequency, the interaction between the number of living children and age, and overall engagement in activities. Fairness analyses revealed model biases in underrepresented subgroups within the dataset, such as individuals with 7-9 years of education. Discussion: These findings highlight the potential of using accessible, low-cost SDoH survey data for predicting risk of cognitive decline in aging populations. They also underscore the importance of incorporating fairness metrics into predictive modeling pipelines to ensure equitable performance across diverse groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.