ArticleBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Interdisciplinary Swiss consensus recommendations for follow-up after radical cystectomy and trimodal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
49 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy are treatment options for non-metastatic bladder cancer. However, there is limited evidence guiding post-treatment follow-up regimens, resulting in variations in care. Objective: A Swiss consensus meeting aimed to identify gaps in follow-up strategies and subsequently tailoring follow-up protocols after curative treatment for bladder cancer. Methods: A consensus meeting including participants from urology, oncology, radiation oncology, neuro-urology, international advisors, and patient representatives was held. 19 pre-formulated questions addressing follow-up duration, frequency, and modalities after radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy for bladder cancer were discussed and voted by participants. Results: 42 experts from 22 institutions participated in the meeting. Agreement was reached on several important elements of oncological and functional follow-up like risk-adapted follow-up and regular usage of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and 3 novel personalized follow-up schedules were suggested, balancing oncological surveillance, and monitoring functional complications. Conclusion: We agreed on 3 newly developed Swiss follow up schedules for patients with bladder cancer who underwent cystectomy or trimodal therapy with curative intent; these protocols include stage-specific recommendations for type and timing of investigations to detect relapse combined with balanced measures to monitor functional complications such as PROMS and specific clinical examinations. These protocols will be evaluated in a prospective national multicentric cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.