Article in Aquaculture nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Yubo WuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation, School of Life Sciences, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China, tzc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-1513
Xiaojie LuKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Ecosystem and Bioresource, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Marine Resources, Environment and Sustainable Development, Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai, 536000, Guangxi, China, mnr.gov.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9207-9486
Yueyuan TanKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Ecosystem and Bioresource, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Marine Resources, Environment and Sustainable Development, Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai, 536000, Guangxi, China, mnr.gov.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7302-4572
Tinglong YangKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Ecosystem and Bioresource, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Marine Resources, Environment and Sustainable Development, Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai, 536000, Guangxi, China, mnr.gov.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8444-8218
Xiujuan WangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation, School of Life Sciences, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China, tzc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-2498
Xing RenKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Ecosystem and Bioresource, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Marine Resources, Environment and Sustainable Development, Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai, 536000, Guangxi, China, mnr.gov.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9972-4225
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The response of
Indexed as
Acanthopagrus schlegeliiantioxidant enzymesgamma ray irradiationHermetia illucensintestinal microbiota
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Treatment of Dietary Defatted · full record | OpenQuestion