Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550684›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health insights2026

Rural Leaders' Perspectives on Prescribed Burns: A Qualitative Study.

Sarah Oerther, Renée L Davis, Chuntana Reangsing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah OertherGoldfarb School of Nursing, Barnes-Jewish College, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Renée L DavisSchool of Nursing, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA.
Chuntana ReangsingSchool of Nursing, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Funding

Translation CoreP2CES033430 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NSEDU OBOT WITHERSPOON · 2022 to 2026
$5.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P2C ES033430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prescribed burning, the intentional application of fire to landscapes, is a crucial tool for land management. It aids in forest rejuvenation and controls nuisance species. This study explores the perceptions of 19 rural leaders in the Ozark Mountains regarding private landowners' access to information and their involvement in decision-making about prescribed fires in the region. A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Interviews with rural leaders highlighted 3 main themes: structured efforts for community-based land management, capacity building partnerships, and smoke management safety. Our study's findings underscore the transformative potential of prescribed burn associations' structured efforts for community-based land management in bridging gaps between policy, and practice. Our study also reveals how collaborative networks enhance resource-sharing, and decision-making autonomy, thereby expanding prescribed burn access for Missouri's private landowners. Finally, persistent challenges, such as smoke management resource gaps, highlight the need for targeted investments in education and technology. While this research focuses on Mark Twain National Forest in south-central Missouri, its implications extend to other regions of the United States struggling with fragmented landownership and climate-driven wildfire risks, offering insights for scalable prescribed burn strategies.

Indexed as

healthprescribed burnsqualitativesmoke

Identifiers

PMID41550684
PMCPMC12811568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.