ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
Distinct treatment response trajectories to allergen immunotherapy in allergic asthma and rhinitis: Insights from a multicenter study in routine clinical practice.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Acupuncture at the Sphenopalatine Ganglion for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is recognized as an effective treatment, its efficacy varies widely. However, whether clinical response trajectories to AIT differ among individuals and influence its effectiveness has not been investigated. Objective: This study aimed to characterize real-world clinical response trajectories to three-year AIT (3y-AIT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study across 53 centers to identify clinical response trajectories in patients with house dust mite allergic asthma and rhinitis undergoing three-year AIT. The efficacy of AIT was primarily assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for allergic symptoms at 4 time points: baseline (before AIT), and at 1, 2, and 3 years of treatment. Clustering analysis based on VAS changes at these time points was used to define response trajectories. Initial analysis was performed using data from 52 centers (Alliance cohort), and validation was conducted using data from a separate center (Guangzhou cohort). Results: In the Alliance cohort, 4 distinct clinical response trajectories were identified. Cluster 1 showed symptom worsening in the first year, with no improvement by year 3. Cluster 2 exhibited symptom deterioration in the second year, followed by significant recovery and a positive response by year 3. Clusters 3 and 4, characterized by higher and lower baseline symptom severity, respectively, demonstrated marked improvement after 3 years of AIT. In the Guangzhou cohort, a similar pattern of 4 response trajectories was observed: higher baseline symptom severity and family tobacco exposure were key features of Cluster 1 (p < 0.001), while Cluster 2 had the highest rate of respiratory infections (>1/year, p < 0.001). Despite these distinct trajectories, first-year effectiveness emerged as an ideal predictor of the 3-year AIT response, with an AUC of 0.75. Conclusion: This study identified 4 primary treatment response trajectories to 3-year AIT in daily clinical practice, highlighting the heterogeneous nature of AIT responses among individuals. Notably, first-year effectiveness appears to be an ideal predictor of the 3-year AIT outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.