Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550640›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical science advances2025

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of drug-drug interactions between suraxavir marboxil and CYP3A4 inhibitors: Quantitative prediction of pharmacokinetic effects on active metabolite GP1707D07.

Lan Yang, Fan Yang, Chao-Zhuang Shen, Yan-Xin Wang, Xiao-Lin Wang, Lang Lv, Yue-E Wu, Pan-Pan Ye, Bo-Hao Tang, Guo-Xiang Hao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lan YangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Chao-Zhuang ShenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yan-Xin WangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xiao-Lin WangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Lang LvJiangxi Qingfeng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Jiangxi, China.
Yue-E WuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Pan-Pan YeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Bo-Hao TangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Guo-Xiang HaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shou-Sheng YanJiangxi Kvvit Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Jiangxi, China.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yi ZhengDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suraxavir marboxil (GP681) is a promising novel prodrug influenza polymerase acidic (PA) inhibitor whose active metabolite, suraxavir (GP1707D07), is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), raising concerns about drug-drug interactions (DDI) with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Traditional DDI assessment methods are limited for evaluating all potential combinations. This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the DDI risk between GP681 and CYP3A4 inhibitors of varying potency. The model was developed based on physicochemical and in vitro parameters, as well as clinical data, including a phase I single ascending dose study of GP681 tablets and a single-center phase I study evaluating the DDI between GP681 and strong CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole. The model was successfully verified against clinical data, with predicted-to-observed ratios for GP1707D07 exposure under itraconazole co-administration of AUC and C

Indexed as

CYP3A4 inhibitorsDrug-drug interactionPharmacokineticsPhysiologically based pharmacokinetic modelingSuraxavir marboxil

Identifiers

PMID41550640
PMCPMC12709922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.