ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Distinct neural signatures in a sensorimotor synchronization-continuation task.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal sensorimotor timing hinges on the generation, refinement, and employment of internal models to meet task demands. In finger tapping sensorimotor synchronization tasks, this occurs across and within tapping conditions that prompt externally-cued synchronization, followed by un-cued continuation. Theory suggests within each condition, initial behavioral performance is adjusted by internal models. However, whether distinct within- and between condition subprocesses are associated with activation of unique neural networks remains unknown. During fMRI, 100 neurotypical adults completed a finger tapping task with synchronization and continuation conditions. Rapid improvement in tapping accuracy occurred during the initial seconds of both synchronization and continuation conditions. Tapping performance in the first few seconds of each condition was marked by heightened functional activity across sensorimotor, prefrontal-parietal-temporal, and salience network regions compared to subsequent within-condition performance, suggesting rapid refinement of an internal model. Intensity of functional activity within the same regions correlated with task performance. Findings highlight dynamic processes supporting development and refinement of internal models for sensorimotor timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.