Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550619›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Distinct neural signatures in a sensorimotor synchronization-continuation task.

Dae-Jin Kim, Amanda R Bolbecker, Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks, Krista M Wisner, Brian F O'Donnell, Emily L Gildea, William P Hetrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dae-Jin KimDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6664-0869
Amanda R BolbeckerDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Alexandra B Moussa-TooksDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Krista M WisnerDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Brian F O'DonnellDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Emily L GildeaDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
William P HetrickDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Training in Clinical Translational Science: Maximizing the Public Health ImpactT32MH103213 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM P HETRICK · 2015 to 2026
$3.4M
Cerebellar biobehavioral markers in cannabis usersR01DA048012 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HETRICK, WILLIAM P · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002531 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI FOTI, DANIEL JUSTIN, HURLEY, THOMAS D. · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Cerebellar Dysfunction in AutismR21MH118617 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HETRICK, WILLIAM P · 2019 to 2020
$433k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002531NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048012NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH118617NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH103213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal sensorimotor timing hinges on the generation, refinement, and employment of internal models to meet task demands. In finger tapping sensorimotor synchronization tasks, this occurs across and within tapping conditions that prompt externally-cued synchronization, followed by un-cued continuation. Theory suggests within each condition, initial behavioral performance is adjusted by internal models. However, whether distinct within- and between condition subprocesses are associated with activation of unique neural networks remains unknown. During fMRI, 100 neurotypical adults completed a finger tapping task with synchronization and continuation conditions. Rapid improvement in tapping accuracy occurred during the initial seconds of both synchronization and continuation conditions. Tapping performance in the first few seconds of each condition was marked by heightened functional activity across sensorimotor, prefrontal-parietal-temporal, and salience network regions compared to subsequent within-condition performance, suggesting rapid refinement of an internal model. Intensity of functional activity within the same regions correlated with task performance. Findings highlight dynamic processes supporting development and refinement of internal models for sensorimotor timing.

Indexed as

continuationfinger tappinginternal modelsensorimotor synchronizationsynchronization

Identifiers

PMID41550619
PMCPMC12809721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.