Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550611›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2026

Using implementation science to bridge the gaps between political commitment and action in antimicrobial resistance governance under the one health approach in the WHO Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions.

Xiaoran Yu, Huan Wang, Jian Wang, Xin Yuan, Xiaoding Zhou, Qiushui He, Igor Mokrousov, Lin Sun, Yanhui Dong, Zhiyong Zou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evolution of technology and disparities in antimicrobial stewardship: a narrative review.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoran YuInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing, China.
Huan WangInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing, China.
Jian WangInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing, China.
Xin YuanInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing, China.
Xiaoding ZhouInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing, China.
Qiushui HeFinnish Reference Laboratory for Pertussis and Diphtheria, Institute of Biomedicine, InFLAMES Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Igor MokrousovLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Evolutionary Genetics, St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Lin SunLaboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Yanhui DongInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing, China.
Zhiyong ZouInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions, home to more than half of the world's population, bear a disproportionate burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including some of the most severe resistance patterns. The convergence of rapidly growing economies and persistent health system challenges in these regions creates a critical platform for understanding the dynamics of AMR and developing scalable governance approaches relevant to other low- and middle-income countries. This Viewpoint reviews current progress in AMR governance globally and study regions, with a focus on country-specific National Action Plans, and highlights the discrepancies between policy intentions and actual implementation. Implementation science, developed to address research-to-practice gaps, provides a systematic framework for identifying and overcoming barriers to implementation, thereby translating political commitments into actionable interventions. Given the cross-sectoral complexity of AMR, we propose novel strategic priorities to enhance AMR governance by embedding implementation science within the One Health approach. This involves a four-step process: selecting and adapting evidence-based practices, assessing multilevel barriers and enablers, selecting, using and adapting implementation strategies, and evaluating and sustaining their impact. Together, this framework provides a blueprint for localising and operationalising overarching policy concepts into concrete, context-specific actions, with potential lessons for other regions globally.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceImplementation scienceOne healthSoutheast AsiaWestern Pacific

Identifiers

PMID41550611
PMCPMC12811467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.