ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2025
From CNNs to SAM: A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Liver Tumor Segmentation in CT Images.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DTARNU-Net: Dense Tiered Attention Residual Nested U-Net for CT Liver Tumor Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Primary Liver Cancer Imaging: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate liver tumor segmentation is a critical component of clinical assessment, forming the basis for treatment planning, therapy response monitoring, prognostic assessment, and the delivery of precision medicine. However, in real-world clinical practice, this task remains particularly challenging. The intrinsic diversity of liver tumors -manifested in variations of shape, texture, size, and location-combined with the similarity of neighboring organs, indistinct tumor boundaries, and inconsistencies in image acquisition conditions, makes accurate liver lesion segmentation particularly difficult. In clinical practice, traditional segmentation methods are often used due to their interpretability and lower computational requirements. These approaches are labor-intensive and time-consuming, especially when dealing with 3D medical images, making them impractical for large-scale or real-time applications. In recent years, deep learning (DL) models have gained considerable attention for automating liver lesion segmentation. In this comprehensive review, we analyze over 100 research papers focused on DL-based segmentation of liver tumors from computed tomography (CT) images. This survey examines these studies across multiple dimensions, including input data, model architecture, and evaluation metrics. By exploring both pioneering contributions and emerging trends, we highlight the impact of various methodological choices and address the associated limitations of current approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.