ArticleJB & JS open access
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Subsequent Career Changes in Manual Workers: A Long-term Observational Study.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is widely performed for rotator cuff tears, the extent to which manual laborers can return to their original occupations remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of manual workers who change or discontinue their professional activity following ARCR. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent ARCR by a single surgeon between December 2010 and June 2014. Inclusion criteria were a minimum follow-up of 9 years and employment in a manual labor occupation before surgery. Patients completed a long-term follow-up assessment, which included a professional activity questionnaire (primary outcome) and shoulder function evaluations (secondary outcome). Results: A total of 165 patients (55 women, 110 men; mean age 53 ± 5 years at the time of surgery) were followed for an average of 11 ± 1 years. Of these, 128 patients (77%) resumed the same occupation postoperatively, while 37 patients (23%) changed or discontinued their work. There was no group difference for the subjective shoulder value at the final follow-up between physical workers and repetitive workers (p = 0.75). A significant association was found between occupational change and poorer shoulder function, as reflected by lower Constant scores (p = 0.008). The median time to occupational change was 12 months (interquartile range: 6-60 months). The mean was 29.7 ± 33.8 months. Change in professional activity was not associated with the presence of a full-thickness retear (p = 0.70), initial tear type (p = 0.23), or sex (p = 0.09). However, salaried employees were more likely to change their occupation than self-employed individuals (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Most manual workers can maintain their original occupation following ARCR. However, approximately 1 in 4 patients changes or abandons their job, potentially due to suboptimal shoulder function. Self-employed individuals appear less likely to modify their professional activity. Clinical Relevance: Manual laborers undergoing ARCR can generally expect to resume their professional duties. Nevertheless, persistent shoulder symptoms may necessitate a career transition in some cases. Level of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.