ArticleJB & JS open access
Occupational Ionizing Radiation-Induced Skin Injury Among Orthopedic Surgeons: A 5-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This 5-year longitudinal study evaluated changes in occupational radiation exposure and radiation-induced skin injury among orthopaedic surgeons, focusing on the effects of educational campaigns. Methods: Orthopaedic surgeons at Hirosaki University were surveyed in 2019 and 2024. Self-reported weekly fluoroscopy ("beam-on") time and dermatologist-graded hand skin findings were compared. Educational campaigns (2020-2023) emphasized As Low As Reasonably Achievable principles and personal protective equipment. We hypothesized that repeated education would improve radiation-safety attitude, reduce self-reported fluoroscopy time, and mitigate dermatologic injury. Results: The proportion of surgeons cautious about radiation increased from 5.8% to 70.9%. The median weekly self-reported fluoroscopy time decreased from 9.5 to 8.0 minutes (p = 0.045). The prevalence of radiation-induced skin injury declined from 34.9% to 25.6%. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (weighted κ = 0.910). Nonspine surgeon status predicted improvement in skin condition. Conclusions: During the 5-year period in which repeated radiation-safety education was conducted, surgeons demonstrated improved safety attitudes, decreased self-reported fluoroscopy time, and improved dermatologist-graded skin findings. These observations indicate an association between educational activities, self-reported exposure, and skin findings, but do not establish causality because exposure was self-reported and the study lacked a control group. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.