ReviewJB & JS open access
Continuous Local Antibiotic Perfusion: A Novel Technique for the Treatment of Orthopaedic Infections: Narrative Review.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rifampicin in Osteoarticular Infections: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Successful Limb Salvage in MRSA Bacteremic Septic Charcot Midfoot Using Continuous Local Antibiotic Perfusion and Circular External Fixation: A Case Report.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orthopedic infections, including fracture-related infection and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), remain difficult to eradicate because bacteria within biofilms exhibit high tolerance to systemic antibiotics. Conventional antibacterial strategies based on minimum inhibitory concentration often fail in the biofilm environment, where substantially higher antimicrobial concentrations are required. Continuous local antibiotic perfusion (CLAP) has emerged as a technique that enables sustained delivery of high local antibiotic concentrations directly to the infected site while providing continuous drainage using negative pressure wound therapy. Methods: This narrative review summarizes the principles, technical aspects, clinical indications, and reported outcomes of CLAP. A literature search of the MEDLINE database was conducted up to July 2025 using the term "continuous local antibiotic perfusion." Clinical studies describing the use of CLAP in orthopedic infections, including case reports, case series, and retrospective studies, were reviewed. Perfusion strategies (iMAP, iSAP, iJAP, and TRAP), antibiotic regimens, safety considerations, and current limitations were analyzed. Results: CLAP enabled delivery of high local antibiotic concentrations exceeding the minimum biofilm eradication concentration while maintaining relatively low systemic exposure. Favorable outcomes for infection control, implant retention, and fracture union, were reported across various intractable infections, including fungal PJI. Complications such as transient elevations in serum antibiotic levels and renal dysfunction were reported but appeared to be infrequent. Although CLAP has shown potential utility in refractory infections, further high-quality studies with rigorous safety evaluations are required to strengthen the evidence base. Conclusion: CLAP is a promising adjunctive strategy for challenging orthopedic infections, offering targeted high-concentration antibiotic delivery with effective drainage. However, current evidence is limited to low-level studies. Prospective trials, standardized protocols, and long-term safety evaluations are needed to define its role in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.