ArticleLearning health systems2026
Access Improvement in Healthcare: Be Quick, but Don't Hurry?
Article in Learning health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Access Improvement in Healthcare: Be Quick, but Don't Hurry?Learning health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Access improvement is a fundamental component of value-based healthcare as it inherently promotes quality by eliminating chokepoints, redundancies, and inefficiencies that could hinder the provisioning of timely care. Yet as healthcare organizations struggle with cost containment, the question of how to most effectively enhance access remains largely unsolved. Given the economic, regulatory, and social forces across the healthcare marketplace, the critical importance of access in optimizing efficiency is increasingly being recognized. The purpose of this review is to thus present a practical framework that offers healthcare organizations an actionable, thematic-based foundation for approaching access improvement. Methods and Materials: An interpretive synthesis of health access as it relates to the timely, satisfactory, and sustainable receipt of services was presented while addressing operational constraints, inclusivity and underlying determinants of health. The criticality of this concept, spanning the entire healthcare continuum and encompassing all aspects of care delivery, from making an initial appointment to completing treatment and being followed thereafter, was evaluated. Empirical lessons were highlighted for discussion. Results: Given the sense of urgency that exists around this issue, the potential pitfalls of "hurrying" to initiate access improvement are frequently overlooked by health systems. Considerations related to workforce shortages, resource limitations, logistical coordination, workflow processes, space capacity, provider availability, and organizational culture and hierarchy, among others, need to be methodically addressed so as not to introduce new inefficiencies into a healthcare environment that is already viewed by many as overly bureaucratic. Based on the core themes that emerged, a conceptual framework for access improvement centered on strategy, alignment, execution, adaptation, and reflection was developed. Conclusion: The design, planning, and operationalization of access improvement initiatives in healthcare require meticulous organizational preparation and a deliberate leadership approach incorporating principles of change management. Success will be dependent on achieving the appropriate balance between speed, purpose, and precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.