Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550533›Full record

ArticleEJC skin cancer2025

Selecting first-line immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: Current evidence on efficacy across diverse patient populations.

Sophia Kreft, Tommaso Bosetti, Rebecca Lee, Paul Lorigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJC skin cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interleukin-1β Gene (Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophia KreftThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0997-4623
Tommaso BosettiThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6202-5041
Rebecca LeeThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2540-2009
Paul LoriganThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 225724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has dramatically changed the outcome for patients with advanced melanoma, with significant improvements in overall survival and potential cure for some. The recent approval of nivolumab in combination with relatlimab (nivolumab-relatlimab) added a third immunotherapy option for first-line treatment for advanced melanoma. Nivolumab-relatlimab has shown greater efficacy compared to single-agent nivolumab and has fewer unacceptable side effects compared to the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipilimumab-nivolumab). However, the lack of both long-term follow-up data and direct comparison with ipilimumab-nivolumab raises uncertainty about where to position nivolumab-relatlimab in clinical practice. Since most patients who respond to combination ipilimumab-nivolumab also respond to nivolumab-relatlimab, and many to single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monotherapy, the challenge is to identify the subgroup of patients who need ipilimumab-nivolumab and would not achieve similar benefits from less toxic alternatives. This review discusses the available data on efficacy of the three approved first-line immunotherapies (single-agent anti-PD-1, nivolumab-relatlimab or ipilimumab-nivolumab) and their value in distinct population groups to help guide clinical decisions.

Indexed as

First-line treatmentImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMelanomaTreatment selection

Identifiers

PMID41550533
PMCPMC7618636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.