Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550457›Full record

ArticleBJR case reports2026

Imaging of Urachal Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.

V Pramod, S C Sanjay, R Dheepika

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BJR case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V PramodDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560002, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4385-2536
S C SanjayDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560002, India.
R DheepikaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560002, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma of the urachus is a rare but highly aggressive malignancy that arises from the urachal remnant. Due to its non-specific symptoms and potential to mimic more common and benign conditions, accurate and early diagnosis through imaging is crucial. This report will discuss the role of imaging in urachal adenocarcinoma regarding the characteristics and diagnosis of this tumour, with a focus on CECT, MRI, and ultrasound for detection, staging, and treatment planning. Since urachal adenocarcinoma is a rare and complex disease, optimal results can be achieved only with a combined approach, where close cooperation among urologists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists is absolutely necessary. This investigation underlines the importance of increased awareness and expertise in the early and accurate imaging of this malignancy and advocates that optimal survival and quality of life can be best achieved in these patients by a well-coordinated, expert-driven approach.

Indexed as

bladder carcinomaCECThematuriaMRIultrasounduracahal adenocarcinomaurachal remnanturachus

Identifiers

PMID41550457
PMCPMC12804070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.