ArticleCase reports in neurology
Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Speech in Nonfluent Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder that causes a gradual decline in language function. While combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with rehabilitation of speech and language disorders (SLD rehab) has shown promise, its effect on motor speech disorders such as dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AOS), common in nonfluent variant PPA (nfvPPA), has been unclear. Case Presentation: This study used an N-of-1 crossover design to investigate the effects of SLD rehab-tDCS on articulation and vocalization in a 77-year-old male patient with nfvPPA, dysarthria, and AOS. In the intervention phase, intervention A (anodal tDCS over the left inferior frontal gyrus from the precentral regions, combined with SLD rehab) was compared with intervention B (sham stimulation with SLD rehab) across both short-term (single session) and long-term (12 sessions over 6 weeks) phases, with intervention A preceding B. In both the short- and long-term phases, the assessments of articulation and vocalization showed greater improvement following intervention A. The long-term intervention also led to improvements in general aphasia severity. Furthermore, brain perfusion SPECT imaging revealed increased blood flow in the left fronto-subcortical network. Conclusions: These preliminary findings from a single case suggest that SLD rehab-tDCS may have the potential to improve not only language but also speech motor functions in nfvPPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.