Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550440›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2026

The inframammary fold: Structure, clinical considerations, and reconstructive techniques.

Camellia Richards, Sonam Patel, Hannah Markham, Jajini Varghese, Ramsey I Cutress

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camellia RichardsCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sonam PatelCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Hannah MarkhamHistopathology Department, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jajini VargheseThe Breast Unit, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ramsey I CutressCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inframammary fold is a defining structure of breast position and form. Disruption, relocation and reconstruction of the Inframammary fold is therefore significant and may present surgical challenges. Furthermore, the inframammary fold's anatomy, structure, relationship to other key thoracic landmarks and how these factors impact reconstruction is debated in the literature. Several reconstructive techniques have been proposed since the IMF was first described as a distinct structure. These are commonly used in isolation or in combination, however there is a lack of direct comparison between different reconstruction methods. Much of the current literature is based on level IV or level V evidence often with small sample sizes. The inframammary fold's anatomy is discussed in this review on a macro- and microscopic level. Indications and procedures for inframammary fold reconstruction are discussed. The distinct challenges presented by different reconstructive techniques, gender-affirming surgery, inframammary fold insufficiencies and pathologies are considered.

Indexed as

AnatomyBottoming-outDouble-bubbleGender-affirming surgeryInframammary foldReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41550440
PMCPMC12803885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.