Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550433›Full record

ArticleComputational urban science2026

Disentangling the impacts of collective mobility of residents and non-residents on burglary levels.

Tongxin Chen, Kate Bowers, Tao Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational urban science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tongxin ChenCentre of Excellence for Data Science, Artificial Intelligence and Modelling, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1763-6876
Kate BowersDepartment of Security and Crime Science, University College London, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ UK.
Tao ChengSpaceTimeLab for Big Data Analytics, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how the collective mobility (including movement and visiting) of residents and non-residents affects neighbourhood burglary levels. While past research has linked mobility to urban crime, this study explores how these relationships vary across population groups and social contexts at the neighbourhood level. Using mobile phone GPS data, we distinguished between residents and non-residents based on daily movement patterns. We then measured their mobility within defined spatial and temporal units. An explainable machine learning method (XGBoost and SHAP) was used to assess how mobility patterns influence burglary in London's LSOAs from 2020 to 2021. Results show that increased collective mobility is generally associated with higher burglary levels. Specifically, non-resident footfall and residents' stay-at-home time have a stronger influence than other variables like residents' travelled distance. The impact also varies across neighbourhoods and shifts during periods of COVID-19 restrictions and relaxations. These findings confirm the dynamic link between mobility and crime, highlighting the value of understanding population-specific patterns to inform more targeted policing strategies.

Indexed as

Crime analysisExplainable machine learningGeo big dataHuman mobilityMobile phone GPS data

Identifiers

PMID41550433
PMCPMC12805924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.