ArticleClinical case reports2026
Recurrent Spontaneous Coronary Dissection in Puerperium Precipitating in Cardiogenic Shock Prompted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recurrent Spontaneous Coronary Dissection in Puerperium Precipitating in Cardiogenic Shock Prompted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report details a rare instance of recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) in a 39-year-old woman following the delivery of twins, leading to cardiogenic shock. SCAD, although occurring most commonly in middle-aged women (45-52 years), can also occur in young, otherwise healthy women, in association with pregnancy. In this situation, it poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly during pregnancy or postpartum periods. This patient's emergency coronary angiography revealed double-vessel SCAD, and initial treatment with a drug-eluting stent failed. Surgical intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was ultimately necessary due to recurrent dissection and hemodynamic instability. The case underscores the utility of CABG as a definitive treatment for SCAD, particularly when percutaneous interventions are insufficient. Additionally, the report discusses the importance of early diagnosis using advanced imaging techniques and highlights postoperative management, including beta-blockers to reduce recurrence risk. This case provides insights into SCAD's complex pathophysiology and the critical role of tailored intervention strategies for young women postpartum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.