ReviewPerspectives on behavior science2025
Identity Matching and Stimulus Equivalence Learning Paradigms for Memory Rehabilitation of Explicit Memory Deficits: A Scoping Review.
Review in Perspectives on behavior science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Explicit memory dysfunction, such as in Alzheimer's dementia, impairs learning and daily functioning, requiring effective rehabilitation strategies to promote functional independence. Relational learning paradigms such as stimulus equivalence learning (SEL) imply the formation of networks of relations in which trained relations give rise to emergent relations, potentially providing a novel approach to addressing deficits in remembering and stimulus control. We evaluated the scope and nature of research on the application of relational learning paradigms for memory rehabilitation. In particular, we outline the evidence for the efficacy of identity matching and SEL in specific disorders, the associated effective strategies, and challenges to guide future research. A systematic search following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines identified 23 reports categorized into identity matching, arbitrary matching, and differential outcome procedure (DOP) paradigms. Findings were mixed regarding the success of training procedures. Studies indicate particularly positive outcomes under the DOP and overall efficacy seemed to depend on impairment severity. However, current evidence on the efficacy of relational learning paradigms in individuals with explicit memory dysfunction remains inconclusive due to uncontrolled designs and methodological weaknesses in statistical analysis and patient reporting. Nevertheless, insights from the reviewed studies can inform more rigorous future research. The focus should be on identifying the necessary and sufficient conditions for training stimulus equivalence relations in this population, within meaningful and well-controlled experimental designs to validate the preliminary findings and assess SEL's potential as a cognitive intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.