Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550357›Full record

ReviewCancer pathogenesis and therapy2026

Methionine restriction for cancer therapy: From preclinical studies to clinical trials.

Nagaraju Bandaru, Shaik Mohammad Noor, Maha Lakshmi Kammili, Mohan Gandhi Bonthu, Alluri Pavani Gayatri, Perli Kranti Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer pathogenesis and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Significance of GSH and HRedox report : communications in free radical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Methionine regulates antitumor function of CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nagaraju BandaruDepartment of Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sandip University, Nashik, Maharashtra 422213, India.
Shaik Mohammad NoorCollege of Pharmacy, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddesweram, Andhra Pradesh 520002, India.
Maha Lakshmi KammiliCollege of Pharmacy, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddesweram, Andhra Pradesh 520002, India.
Mohan Gandhi BonthuDepartment of Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sandip University, Nashik, Maharashtra 422213, India.
Alluri Pavani GayatriDepartment of Pharmacology, Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra 422213, India.
Perli Kranti KumarDepartment of Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sandip University, Nashik, Maharashtra 422213, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methionine restriction (MR) has shown significant promise in cancer therapy because it targets the unique methionine dependency of many tumors. However, despite extensive research on MR, a clear synthesis of preclinical findings and their translation into clinical settings is lacking. This review aims to address this gap by consolidating existing evidence, identifying challenges, and highlighting opportunities for advancing MR as a viable cancer treatment strategy. Preclinical studies have revealed that MR effectively hinders cancer cell proliferation, triggers cell cycle arrest, and enhances the effectiveness of standard treatments, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Mechanistically, MR disrupts critical cancer pathways by influencing epigenetic regulation, redox balance, and autophagy. Moreover, animal models have demonstrated notable tumor suppression and extended survival, underscoring the therapeutic potential of MR. Early-phase clinical trials are now examining MR in combination with established therapies, reporting positive preliminary results regarding safety and tolerability, and investigating biomarkers for predicting patient responsiveness. These findings suggest the utility of MR as a complementary treatment strategy, particularly for tumors resistant to conventional therapies. The outcomes of this study underscore the importance of further research to refine MR protocols, understand long-term effects, and identify optimal patient groups. Furthermore, combining MR with immunotherapies, targeted treatments, and advanced modalities such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy may offer new therapeutic pathways. Additionally, the development of MR-mimetic drugs and targeted supplements can improve patient compliance and broaden the therapeutic applicability of MR. Large-scale clinical trials are essential to evaluate the efficacy of MR across diverse cancer types, focusing on sustainability and safety over extended periods. If successful, MR can transform cancer therapy by exploiting metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer cells, providing a novel and less toxic treatment option for challenging malignancies.

Indexed as

Cancer treatmentClinical studiesMethionine metabolismPreclinical studies

Identifiers

PMID41550357
PMCPMC12810544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.