Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550352›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Experience sampling methodology in pediatrics: a qualitative analysis of user perspectives on the PROfeel blended mHealth intervention for fatigue.

Anna M Braspenning, Maartje D Stutvoet, Sanne L Nijhof, Elise van de Putte, Remco C Veltkamp, Rens Brankaert, Inge M B Bongers, Eveline J M Wouters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna M Braspenning *Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Maartje D Stutvoet *Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Sanne L NijhofPediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Elise van de PuttePediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Remco C VeltkampInformation and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Rens BrankaertTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Inge M B BongersTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Eveline J M WoutersTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Children with chronic health conditions are at risk for persistent somatic symptoms such as fatigue, influenced by biological and psychosocial factors. Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM) in mobile Health (mHealth) enables personalized insights into symptom-related factors, potentially improving self-management and quality of life. Blended care-combining digital and in-person support-enhances adherence and interpretation of ESM insights. Despite its potential, no blended ESM intervention has yet transitioned into pediatric care. This study explores direct and indirect user perspectives on the use and implementation of ESM-supported blended mHealth in pediatric care. Methods: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study on PROfeel, an ESM-supported blended mHealth intervention for fatigue management. PROfeel includes a smartphone-based ESM period, followed by face-to-face feedback and shared decision-making for tailored lifestyle goals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients ( Results: Patients and IOs identified three themes: (1) wish for improvement vs. ESM effort, (2) value of insights, and (3) support and ownership. Patients were motivated by improvement but found ESM effort challenging. Insights into fatigue and lifestyle factors were valued, though lifestyle change remained limited. Independent use fostered ownership, while parents provided support. HCPs identified the themes (1) balancing patient value and effort, (2) defining roles within the intervention, and (3) concerns about effectiveness, financial coverage, and time. Patient value was the key determinant for PROfeel use, balanced against intervention effort and eligibility criteria. HCPs stressed the need for aligned roles and practical feasibility. Discussion: ESM-supported care shows promise for children with chronic conditions and may serve as an early intervention. Blended care accommodates autonomy levels and supports ESM insight interpretation. Implementation in hospital-wide care could suit varied clinical needs. Active involvement of end users is essential to maximize patient value and ensure successful integration into pediatric care.

Indexed as

adolescentsblended carechronic diseaseecological momentary assessmentsexperience sampling methodologyimplementationmHealth

Identifiers

PMID41550352
PMCPMC12807976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.