SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2025
An in-depth exploration of machine learning methods for mental health state detection: a systematic review and analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of lay and clinical narratives for transparent autism diagnosis using BioBERT deep learning.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Money and mental health: a scoping review of financial variables, data sources, and analytical methods.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The global rise in mental health issues has become a significant public health challenge, exacerbated by the reluctance of many individuals to share their mental health concerns due to social stigma. Effective medical interventions and support systems are urgently needed. Researchers are increasingly turning to machine learning as a potential tool for diagnosing and addressing mental health conditions. Objective: This systematic review identifies and categorizes machine-learning techniques applied to mental health detection, examines studies predicting mental health states, compiles available datasets, and analyzes the most frequently used algorithms for mental health assessment. Methods: An extensive search was conducted across prominent databases such as Springer, ScienceDirect, IEEE, and PubMed, spanning the period from January 2015 to December 2024, using relevant keywords. Initially, 3,320 articles were selected based on their titles and abstracts. After careful examination, 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. Among the selected 35 studies, 14 leveraged data from online social networks to identify mental health issues, while 21 collected data through various manual means. These studies employed a diverse array of machine learning techniques, encompassing both supervised and unsupervised approaches. Results: Machine learning exhibits promise in assisting with the diagnosis of mental health conditions and our studies show that machine learning is an effective and efficient way to detect mental health. However, further research is warranted in several key areas. Future studies should explore improved sampling methods, refine prediction algorithms, and address ethical considerations regarding using sensitive mental health data. Furthermore, incorporating image processing techniques could introduce a new dimension to this field. Collaboration with mental health specialists can augment the validity and impact of research outcomes in this critical domain. Conclusion: The systematic review underscores the potential of machine learning in addressing mental health issues and emphasizes the importance of ongoing research and collaboration to optimize its application in the field. It also shows that, although simpler and more interpretable models such as logistic regression are frequently used as baselines, the highest reported performances are usually achieved by more complex deep learning architectures, underscoring a central trade-off between model interpretability and predictive accuracy in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.