ArticleHardwareX2026
Design of a low-cost, portable blower-based breath simulator using 3D printing for respiratory research and education.
Article in HardwareX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In contemporary times, as air pollution becomes increasingly severe, the challenge for healthcare in addressing respiratory-related diseases has become more urgent than ever. To assist in researching the domain of medical equipment and education training, this paper aims to create a blower-based breath simulator (BBS) for the physiological processes of spontaneous breathing by using low-cost materials and easy-to-build hardware. Specifically, the BBS focuses on providing a representation of breathing patterns, lung compliance, and airway resistance. Notably, the BBS is built on a portable 3D printable components-based structure designed for fast installation, offering direct control of breathing modes, and can be operated for a long time. Besides, the experimental test is built according to ISO 806601-2-79:2018, with testing on a dual adult training test lung from Michigan Instruments for peak inspiratory pressure, respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, tidal volume, proximal pressure, lung pressure, and demonstrating repeatability. As a result, the BBS meets initial design criteria, which comprise being lightweight, approximately 1.5 kg for the ventilator unit, and low cost, around $650 per unit, fast production time, approximately 100 continuous hours for 3D printing, and 105 h in total for the complete prototype process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.