ArticleHardwareX2026
A cost-effective laboratory device for single slow micro compression testing of soft materials in the small-strain region.
Article in HardwareX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In various microscale applications, accurate evaluation of the mechanical properties of materials under small-strain and low-force conditions is important. However, conventional universal testing machines (UTM) are expensive and difficult to operate reliably under low-force conditions, making them unsuitable for small-strain testing. To overcome these limitations, we developed a cost-effective device for single slow micro-compression testing (MCT) to measure the mechanical properties of materials in the small-strain region. The MCT consists of a force sensor (FlexiForce A301-1, Tekscan, USA), an Arduino-based signal acquisition module, and a high-precision z-stage. The displacement control accuracy of the z-stage was verified using a laser displacement meter (LK-G10, Keyence, Japan), and the experimental results confirmed displacement and force resolutions of 1 µm and 0.01 N, respectively. Under no-load conditions, the force-displacement error between the MCT and a commercial universal testing machine (MTS, AMETEK LRX-plus, LLOYD INSTRUMENTS, UK) was within ± 2.0 %. In addition, standard and one-third-size PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) specimens were fabricated according to ASTM D575-91 and tested using both systems; the error between the two specimens was within ± 0.05 %. From the linear region in the small-strain range, the Young's modulus of the miniature specimen was estimated, showing a percentage error of + 2.2 % from reported values, confirming high precision and reliability. The developed device, with a total fabrication cost below USD 1,500, provides cost-effectiveness, precision, and repeatability, enabling applications in polymer MEMS and soft robotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.